![]() |
|
||
|
If we associate the mortgage market rate with the 7-year index, then the short end of the curve will affect its forward value in 3 years, albeit as a 3:7 ratio. When do we need a two-factor model? Valuation aspect. Even some seasoned experts fall into the misperception
that imperfect correlation between rates may significantly affect the
prepay option's value. Their leading argument has been the fact that
short rates are formally employed by valuation schemes for discounting.
This is an artifact that is completely quantified by the observed market
for European options. Namely, a simple consideration reminiscent of
the Black-Scholes model proves that fixed-rate mortgages will be valued
similarly, provided that: Indeed, correlations between rates don't enter the analysis of European
options or any of their portfolios. In contrast, American options depend
on joint distribution of many rates. Therefore, if a prepay option were
modeled as an American option, the above conclusion would become theoretically
invalid. ARMs, unlike fixed-rate mortgages, may be affected by inter-rate
correlations since their index is typically not the mortgage rate and
may have an imperfect correlation with it. For many valuation exercises with fixed-rate mortgages, a two-factor
model will not add or subtract considerable value extracted by a one-factor
model - once volatility term structures are made identical (taken from
the market) for both models. This is a good time to remind readers that
AD&Co's models satisfy both conditions (A) and (B). We model the
prepay option as a sequence of European payoffs (inefficiently exercised),
whereas our suite of Term Structure Models contains three single-factor
term structure models that can be tied to an arbitrary family of swap
and swaptions. |
|
|
|||||||||||||