Welcome to The S-Curve
Now you will be able to receive the latest announcements, product updates, and our insights on the mortgage market in real time.
The name of the blog, the S-Curve, is a reflection of our logo and the central feature of our prepayment model. S-curves are seen in nature in many phenomenon, from population growth to prepayment and default models. Our first S-curve, in the early 1990s, used the arctangent function, then piece-wise linear functions, and evolved over time to be more complex and vary by FICO, loan size and LTV. This evolution encapsulates both the timeless nature of fundamental relationships and constant innovation to describe them better over time.
We hope you find the information useful and we look forward to your feedback.
-
Why Financial Firms Need a New Climate Change Risk Strategy Starting NowThoughts
According to a report by the Research Institute for Housing America, climate change risk is rapidly increasing in the housing industry and will continue to demand more attention and regulation in the near future.
Climate change will impact risk factors in the housing industry in nearly every corner of the globe. Wildfires are becoming more common and the area they ravage more extensive. Hurricanes and severe storms are happening with more frequency and severity. Potential damage from excess heat and droughts elevates risk to properties every day.
However, flooding is currently one of the highest risk factors posed to the housing industry. Many housing areas are used to the idea of flood risk and are adequately prepared and protected, but many properties that were never at risk before are now in the danger zone. The housing market is currently in a vulnerable position.
When Floods Outpace Insurance Policies
Depending on geography, more properties without previous flood risk are increasingly likely to experience flood damage. Homes and communities that were erected in floodplains are used to the protocols: Safety procedures such as evacuating or securing the area, working with insurance to cover damage, or receiving aid to rebuild when possible.
Under the National Flood Insurance Program, homes that are federally backed by programs such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in certain areas require the owners to carry flood insurance. Those homes are located in floodplains that are defined based on a 100-year flood probability.
The problem is that floodplain boundaries are rapidly changing. One hundred years' worth of flooding data is not as relevant as it used to be when flooding zones are becoming more and more volatile. Even as the area of potential flooding damage overflows into neighboring regions, the floodplain boundaries have not been redrawn recently enough to impact flood policy uptake.
That means many homes that are at risk of future flooding are not likely or required to carry flood insurance. Experts are predicting that the National Flood Insurance Program will be stretched to its limits very soon, and that banking and insurance regulation will need to act quickly to spread and manage climate-related risk. It's possible that soon, the total cost of owning homes will outpace the value of the home.
This becomes very concerning when we consider the likelihood of mortgages going unpaid; a lack of flood insurance then quickly becomes not just a housing risk but a credit risk for the owners and an economic risk for the country if housing prices plummet and people’s debts begin to far outvalue their assets.
Updating Risk Calculations on Climate Change Analysis
Firms currently vary in their preparedness to face climate change insurance risk. As data becomes more advanced, some firms have begun to license property-level climate risk data, and specialist analytics firms are appearing with expertise in climate models.
The Fed and the SEC are also trying to adapt regulations to fit the new (and ever-changing) reality of climate change risk. There are new committees dedicated to assessing climate change analysis and determining systemic risk to the entire financial world, including the Supervision Climate Committee. These regulators will need updated methods to quantify risk and mandate disclosure, but for now, changes are nascent and firms will have to add their own experience to the bank of loss exposure research.
Financial firms are facing — or are about to face — considerable pressure from investors, governing and regulatory bodies, and insurance and banking regulators concerning the way they calculate risk. They will probably also feel some pressure from employees and workers in the financial sector, who are becoming increasingly alarmed about the impending disruption of climate change.
Firms will need to manage climate risk alongside their broader risk management strategy. For that to work, they’ll need to understand climate change data and the set of exposure scenarios that are relevant to them. For example, McKinsey predicts that about one-third of the planet's land will be affected by climate change. In addition, flooding exacerbated by climate change is expected to double the damage to capital stock by 2030.
Financial institutions urgently need to understand how to calculate and explain the risks posed by climate change, both for their own risk management strategies and for stakeholders. Quantifying climate change risk will be an evolving science. Property portfolios will require new risk scores based on the potential hazards that climate change will bring. Those scores will then need translating into commonly used financial measures, such as credit risk, market risk and prepayment risk.
As financial firms wait for regulatory approaches to become clear, they will need to continue to educate themselves and to remember that climate change models will shift rapidly — the best climate change risk strategy will be the one that is most able to change.
The S-Curve Archives
-
Thoughts
Summary
In 2021, Andrew Davidson & Co. Inc. (AD&Co) proposed a benchmark cohort approach to setting Ability-to-Repay (ATR) Qualified Mortgages (QM) standards. Successful benchmarks based on data are model-free and transparent, and the cohorts must perform consistently in comparison to one another and across time. Our original work used data through the early stages of the pandemic when non-performing loan percentages skyrocketed.
-
ThoughtsHow Lowering Capital Costs Affects Higher-Risk Loans
Government-sponsored enterprises (or GSEs) are companies that provide guarantees and financing to originators through the mortgage secondary market. The size and resilience of the GSE secondary market maximizes diversification and liquidity which reduces financial risk and cost of capital. This benefit accrues to conforming borrowers through lower mortgage rates and resiliently available financing.
-
ProductsThe release of Andrew Davidson & Co., Inc.’s (AD&Co) new generation of financial engineering tools marks a shift to a new reality; when the traditional benchmark for MBS valuation, the LIBOR/ Swap yield curve, becomes unavailable. Our recent Product Release email informed our readers about the change. In short, our users can:
-
ThoughtsFHFA held a listening session for interested parties on its proposed rule on the GSE process for credit scores. The objective is making mortgage underwriting and pricing more accurate and more fair while balancing practical implementation by firms in the mortgage ecosystem. Along with many others, I had the opportunity to provide insights on this proposed rulemaking.
-
ThoughtsIn our January 19th blog entitled, A More Equitable Lending System Will Not Be Created by Accident, we described the efforts it will take to overcome not just bias in lending today, but the systemic factors that have limited access to credit in the past and have created an unjust system.
-
ThoughtsIn this short blog post I discuss some developments taking place in the flood insurance landscape in the US and look ahead at a few potential directions things could go. I suggest that universal catastrophic flood insurance coverage with a continuation of the introduction of risk-based pricing would be a significant improvement.
-
ThoughtsIntroduction
The Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) entered conservatorship in September 2008. One could view the succeeding thirteen years as a journey back to financial stability with a refined operating model that looks more like a financial utility than a hedge fund. This business model is more compatible with a fair lending mission for a standard-setter that maintains secondary markets under an effective regulator. The GSEs remain the largest part of the housing finance backbone and a resilient funding source during economic stress.
-
Thoughts
Around 75% of white American families were homeowners in the first quarter of 2020, according to data from the United States Census Bureau. However, only 44% of Black American families owned their homes at the same time.
-
Thoughts
According to a report by the Research Institute for Housing America, climate change risk is rapidly increasing in the housing industry and will continue to demand more attention and regulation in the near future.
-
Thoughts
Mortgage market participants are keenly aware that the Federal Reserve has been scaling back its UST and MBS purchases and factoring the outcomes of its actions on stakeholders across markets.